| PREHISTORIC LIFE HOME | PREHISTORIC LIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS | OBL HOME | OBL REFERENCES | |||||||||||||||
|
AMPHIBIANS 1
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
For most of earth’s history, there was no
life on land. One reason was that,
until photosynthesis had contributed enough oxygen to form an ozone layer,
too much ultraviolet light from the sun bombarded the land, making life
impossible. In the Siluran Period, plants and arthropods
made the transition to land 100 million years before vertebrates made
a similar transition. Although
moving from aquatic to terrestrial life seems like an enormous change
for a fish, a variety of modern ray-finned (actinopterygian) fish, such
as mudskippers and walking catfish, have adapted to terrestrial life by
crawling on their fins, adapting their gills for air breathing, and/or
gulping air with a swim bladder.
Life on land presents new challenges to formerly
aquatic animals:
a)
breathing
oxygen from air rather than water: An
air bladder capable of breathing atmospheric air evolved in the first
bony fish (if not earlier) and lungs evolved in early sarcopterygians.
Many amphibians possess gills during their larval stage (and some retain
them as adults) which they use to breathe underwater.
A frog tadpole in the process of metamorphosis is depicted below. |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
| b) locomotion The
first amphibians did not need to evolve new bones such as the scapula and
clavicle of the shoulder, bones for the hip, the humerus, radius and ulna
for the arm, or the femur, tibia, and fibula for the leg—these bones were
already present in the fins of advanced sarcopterygian fish. Perhaps these
fossil fish used their fins/limbs to leave water briefly to move from one
body of water to another or to move along the bottom.
Amphibians made a few modifications to the fins/limbs of rhipidistians.
The pectoral girdle was separated from the bones of the skull, fingers and
toes developed from cartilaginous fin rays, and the pelvis had to fuse to
the spinal column for support. The hip and leg of a salamander are depicted
below. |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
It is possible that the molecular changes
which converted fins to limbs were not extensive. There is one set of genes (the Hox genes) which
guide the development of both fins and tetrapod limbs. In fish, these genes are turned off after a
short period of expression while in tetrapods their expression lasts longer. Mutant mice which lacked any HoxA/HoxD expression in their limbs did not produce the Sonic Hedgehog signal needed for the development of the forearms and digits. The arm consisted only of a humerus which interestingly had an “L”-like shape. Although there were cartilaginous rays which formed distal to the humerus, these were the products of an “abnormal cartilaginous plate” and not homologues of any normal forelimb bones (Kmita, 2005). c) more weight to bear Water obviously provides buoyancy
which helps support an animal’s weight.
Not only were the limbs strengthened and the pelvis attached to
the vertebral column, the vertebral column itself had to become stronger. The adaptation of the vertebral column to bear
weight on land occurred gradually as the parts of the vertebrae became
larger, fused together, and replaced the notochord. This will be discussed in greater detail when
reptiles are examined. d) resist water
loss (dessication) Tetrapods breathe through their nose rather than mouth in order
to limit water loss. The first
tetrapods would have been partially protected by the scales of their fish
ancestors. Reptiles developed keratin
scales in the skin to prevent water loss.
Amphibians could not do this since their lungs, while functional,
are still inefficient. Modern amphibians
depend on exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide through their skin. In fact, a very successful family of salamanders
in e) change in sense
organs The lateral line system, involving a system of grooves in the
skull, was used by sarcopterygians to locate animals and objects in water.
Although it was still present in the most primitive amphibians,
it was not useful on land. The eye and olfactory epithelium would have
to be moistened to function in air. Rhipidistians
developed nasolacrimal duct to accomplish this. Part of the jaw apparatus (the hyomandibular)
began to conduct sound to the inner ear and became the stapes. Although its primary function in later tetrapods
would be the transmission of sound waves, in early tetrapods its primary
function was to support the braincase.
It remained a solid, stout bone for quite some time and probably
did not transmit sound well until early reptiles. In conclusion, although the transition to
land involves a number of anatomical and physiological changes, they are
perhaps not as great as they might seem.
Although breathing oxygen from the air is essential, the ancestors
of amphibians had already accomplished this.
Although fins cannot provide the same locomotion styles as limbs,
a number of modern fish have adapted their fins for some degree of terrestrial
locomotion. The sarcopterygian
fish of the past would have been even better prepared for this transition,
given the stout bones in their fins—bones which are homologous to the
bones in tetrapod limbs. Other
adaptations to life on land (such as a strong vertebral column and the
modification of sensory structures) would occur gradually and were not
complete in the first amphibians. What promoted the evolution of sarcopterygian
fish into amphibians? First of
all, any fish which can breathe air can survive in stagnant water while
other fish die. This is clearly
an advantage. The ability to move
onto land, even temporarily could help a fish evade a predator or move
from a pool of water which was drying out.
Finally, it should be remembered that when the first fish began
their transition onto land, terrestrial environments were full of insects
(many of them wingless) which had no vertebrate predators. |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Eusthenopteron was a sarcopterygian fish (a rhipidistian, to be more precise)
which had bones in its fins homologous to tetrapod limb bones (humerus,
radius, ulna, femur, tibia, fibula). The pectoral girdle (the bones which attach
the arm/forelimb to the rest of the skeleton) was still attached to the
skull so that there were a few bones which are lost in the first amphibians. The organization of its skull was very similar
to the first amphibians (they are much more similar to each other than
either is to modern fish or modern amphibians).
Pandericthys also shared
these characteristics and its skull was even more similar to that of early
amphibians (in its frontal bones, shortened snout, and the position of
its eyes) (Ahlberg, 1996; Ahlberg, 1998).
Other fish such as Elginerpeton
and Ventastega were close to the amphibian lineage (in neither of these
are fins known; future fossils might indicate that they also had fingers)
(Ahlberg, 1995). PECTORAL GIRDLES: In humans, the pectoral girdle consists of
the scapula (shoulder blade) and clavicle (collarbone); these bones attach
the arm to the axial skeleton (the skull, vertebral column, and rib cage). Other modern tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles,
birds, other mammals) not only possess a scapula but may possess a clavicle,
interclavicle (lost in placental mammals), and an anterior coracoid or
procoracoid (bones which were lost in placental mammals).
(Note: although the human scapula has a “coracoid”, this is actually
the posterior coracoid and is not the same as the procoracoid mentioned
here.) Early fish possessed a few additional bones,
attaching the pectoral girdle to the skull (thus, they had no “neck”)
called the postcleithra, anocleithrum, supracleithrum, posttemporal, and
cleithrum. In the early amphibians,
some of these bones are lost (creating a neck, a separation between the
skull and pectoral girdle) but the cleithrum remains the largest element
(Carroll, 1988; Kardong, 2002). |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
FIN AND LIMB BONES The human arm has one bone that attaches
to the pectoral girdle and composes the upper arm (the humerus), two bones
in the lower arm (the radius and ulna), small wrist (carpal) bones, bones
of the hand (metacarpals), and finger bones (phalanges). The human leg has one bone that attaches to
the pelvic girdle and makes up the thigh (the femur), two bones of the
lower leg (the tibia and fibula), small ankle (tarsal) bones, bones of
the foot (metatarsals) and toe bones (phalanges). |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Sauripterus possesed a front fin which is even closer to the forelimb
of the first amphibians. (It
was given the name Sauripterus
because the humerus is similar to a previous find that lacked any other
elements of the arm. New fossil
finds may indicate that this new fin belongs to a different species of
sarcopterygian.) In Sauripterus, the fin rays are jointed and resemble fingers that are
associated with wrist elements. There
is some resemblance to fingers of Acanthostega (some researches conclude that there are 8 “fingers” in Sauripterus, as in Acanthostega). No hind limb
is known (Daeschler,
1998). |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Tiktaalik roseae was a late Devonian sarcopterygian fish from shallow-water environments which possessed a number of tetrapod characteristics. It is clearly a fish with fins, fin rays, prominent gills, scales, dermal supracleithral bones of the shoulder, and several skull features which link it to sarcopterygian fish. It is the only known fish to possess a mobile neck which was gained through the loss of a series of skull bones (the intertemporal, opercular, subopercular, and extrascapular). Its ribs were longer and wider than other sarcopterygians. Its longer snout, wide spiracular notch, and postorbital region of the skull are also features which link it to amphibians. The humerus possessed a medial process although it is not as robust as in tetrapods. Tiktaalik is the most primitive vertebrate to possess a wrist joint. There are two wrist bones (ulnare and intermedium) which articulate with radial bones (four from the ulnare and one from the intermedium although one of the radials from the ulnare articulates with intermediate radials). These wrist bones are homologous and structurally similar to the early tetrapod wrist bones. Its shoulder bones and muscles would have been capable of supporting the limb for both fin-like and arm-like movements (Daeshler, 2006; Shubin, 2006).
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Acanthostega
still retained a number of primitive features from its sarcopterygian
ancestors: fully functional internal gills, gill struts, a primitive ear,
no attachment of the pelvis to the vertebral column, the absence of an
ankle (wrist not preserved), a shoulder bone (anocleithrum) which connected
the shoulder to the skull as in fish, and a tail fin with dermal rods
(as in fish; these rods were different from those of all sarcopterygians
in that they were unbranched and unsegmented).
There are a number of derived features that identify it as the
first amphibian: multijointed fingers and toes, the shape of its limb
bones and girdles, and the loss of some opercular bones of the skull found
in fish. The braincase of Acanthostega was similar to that of fish although the occipital region had begun to fuse in the region of the notochord (Clack, 2002). Compared to earlier osteolepiforms, Acanthostega's snout was longer, its eyes were located farther back on its head and more medially, and the otic region was shorter. Acanthostega lost its lateral rostral bone around the nostril. Much of the region around the nostril was composed of cartilage rather than bone, perhaps a juvenile trait retained from its larval stage. The ancestral skull structure the hyomandibula was modified to become the stapes (which would become one of the middle ear bones used in hearing). Bones around the external nostril were lost as fish adapted to smelling in air. Acanthostega retained the lateral line system in the skull which had served its fish ancestors as a sensory system for hunting aquatic prey. Acanthostega probably possessed at least 3 pairs of gill arches similar to modern lungfish and it probably supplemented the air absorbed from its lungs using its internal gills. The atlas was the only vertebrae that fused across the midline of the body. Although Acanthostega had a neck, the notochord's penetration of the skull made the neck less mobile. Large muscles attached to the exoccipitals to support the neck. The neural arches were reduced in the cervical region (Clack, 2002). Acanthostega's ribs were shorter and not as thick as in Ichthyostega. The interclavicle could have functioned in a way similar to the sternum of later tetrapods (Clack, 2002). Acanthostega, like other early tetrapods retained scales on its underside. The loss of scales on the dorsal surface would have made these tetrapods lighter and allowed more gas exchange through the skin. Acanthostega also had evolved a lacrimal gland, lacrimal ducts, eyelids, eyelid muscles, and a retractor bulbi muscle (Clack, 2002). Although the shoulder girdle had separated from the skull to create a neck, Acanthostega still possessed an anocleithrum like fish (the anocleithrum is one of the bones which had attached the shoulder to the skull in fish; Clack, 2002). In Acanthostega's shoulder, the glenoid cavity was shallow. The radius was twice the length of the ulna and the ulna lacked an olecranon process(Clack, 2002). The femur was longer than the humerus. Although Acanthostega had limbs and digits, it couldn't have supported its weight and walked on these limbs since there were almost no modifications of the sacral vertebrae to interact with pelvic bones. Interestingly, it seems that the number of digits in a tetrapod limb wasn't fixed at five in the first amphibians: Acanthostega had 8 fingers, Ichthyostega had 7 toes, and Tulerpeton had six fingers (Lebedev, 1997; Clack, 2002). Although Acanthostega had limbs and digits,
it couldn’t have supported its weight and walked on these limbs since
there were almost no modifications of the sacral vertebrae to interact
with pelvic bones. Interestingly,
it seems that the number of digits in a tetrapod limb wasn’t fixed at
five in the first amphibians: Acanthostega
had 8 fingers, Ichthyostega
had 7 toes, and Tulerpeton had six fingers (Lebedev, 1997; ). ICHTHYOSTEGA
Ichthyostega is a more advanced amphibian from the Upper Devonian. Although the notochord still stretched the length of the vertebral column in Ichthyostega, it no longer penetrated the braincase, making it easier to move the head. The vertebrae had developed the processes (zygapopyses) which allowed neighboring vertebrae to articulate with one another. The ribs had increased in length. An olecranon process (the elbow) was present although the arm’s movement was limited. The femur was half the length of the humerus. After Ichtyostega, the hip socket became more or less oval in shape and humerus lots its primitive “L” shape and most of the ancestral foramina which passed through it (Clack, 2002) The anterior tectal bone around the nostril was lost. Sacral ribs specialized to attach to the pelvis, allowing the legs to support the weight of the body (Clack, 2002; Carroll) It still retained some primitive features such
as a prominent notochord and 2 opercular bones of the skull. The pelvis of Ichthyostega was attached to the vertebral column and was composed
of the same three separate bones found in all later tetrapod pelvises:
the ilium, ischium, and pubis. (Although
in adult humans there is only one “hip bone” or os coxa, fetal humans
a have completely separate ilium, ischium, and pubis which fuse later
in life to form each hip bone. Many
parts of the adult hip still carry these original names such as the iliac
crest, ischial tuberosity, and pubic symphysis.)
--After Ichtyostega, Acanthostega, and the common ancestor of the early tetrapod Whatcheeria, the preopercular bone which had supported the opercular series of bones was lost; in the early tetrapods it was already reduced in size (Clack, 2002).
Hesperoherpeton was a later amphibian that still possessed the primitive feature of a large canal for notochord in the skull. It possessed several other primitive skull features (the otic and occipital region were still separate from the ethmosphenoid), and the shoulder girdle probably contacted the skull at the tabular bone. I ts derived characteristics included short digits, an otic notch, and larger vertebrae (the pleurocentra portion).
Tulerpeton Tulerpeton had evolved longer limbs and its humerus was similar to the later anthracasaurs. Its hands and feet possessed 6 digits. It had lost its internal gills although it still retained the anocleithrum.
|
||||||||||||||||||