| PREHISTORIC LIFE HOME | PREHISTORIC LIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS | OBL HOME | OBL REFERENCES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PELYCOSAURS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synapsid Reptiles and Mammals
Synapsid reptiles
and the mammals that evolved from them form one monophyletic clade.
There are two groups of synapsid reptiles, the pelycosaurs and
the therapsids, the latter of which includes an advanced group known as
the cynodonts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
PELYCOSAURS From anapsid reptiles evolved two groups
of higher reptiles: the synapsids (which would lead to mammals) and the
diapsids (which would lead to crocodiles, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, and birds).
Although the diapsids would produce many successful lineages which
would reach enormous size during the Mesozoic, the earliest diapsid reptiles
were small reptiles that probably fed on insects.
In contrast, the earlier synapsids were the dominant carnivores
and herbivores of their time, unlike the mouse- to opossum-sized mammalsof
the Mesozoic. The first known pelycosaurs were large reptiles
with large skulls and large canine teeth. These pelycosaurs were adapted to eating large
prey and were the first carnivorous amniotes (Kemp, 1982; Carroll, 1988).
Synapsids possessed both mammalian and reptilian traits. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Kemp,
1982; Carroll, 1988). Although pelycosaurs were the earliest “mammal-like
reptiles”, there are only a few characteristics which have been modified
from the ancestral condition of the anapsid reptiles. The most prominent are the synapsid opening
and the presence of canines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The
majority of the notable features of the pelycosaurs were primitive reptilian
traits. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first pelycosaur, Archaeothyris,
would have resembled a large iguana with short limbs. There is an earlier species Protoclepsydrops known only from a few
bone fragments. Like early anapsid
reptiles, Archaeothyris was
a sprawling reptile and it was closely related to the first anapsid reptiles,
the captorhinomorphs. Captorhinomorphs
had a few derived characteristics compared to synapsids such as a reduced
tabular bone; supratemporal and postorbital bones which don’t contact
each other, a single coronoid bone in lower jaw as opposed to two in synapsids,
and lacked the large medial centrale bone in the foot which synapsids
possessed. These characteristics of the earliest known
reptiles which are more advanced than the condition of pelycosaurs indicate
that the pelycosaurs evolved from a slightly more primitive but as yet
unknown group of anapsid reptiles. There
is an early reptile, Promeriscus
from the Upper Carboniferous, in which the supratemporal and postorbital
bones contact each other as in pelycosaurs.
Although Promeriscus lacks the temporal fenestra
that gives the synapsids their name, there is an open suture (a line of
weakness) in this same region. Many
amphibians have this characteristic as well and it is thought that this
open suture was a remnant of a movable hinge from the skull of crossopterygians
fish (Kemp, 1982; Carroll, 1988). . Archaeothyris
measured about 50 cm and possessed the single temporal fenestra (with
the postorbital and squamosal bones above and the jugal bone below) which
would characterize the synapsids. It
had a long snout and the region of the skull behind the eye socket was
short. The canine teeth were slightly larger than the
others. Archaeothyris was thoroughly reptilian with a brain about the average
size of a reptile’s brain. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All known groups of pelycosaurs appeared before
the end of the Carboniferous and they, not the anapsid or diapsid reptiles,
are the dominant terrestrial vertebrates of the Permian. All three suborders of pelycosaurs evolved from
forms similar to Archaeothyris. 1)
Ophiacodontia The ophiacodonts were the least modified reptiles and include the earliest pelycosaurs and some fish-eating species of the Permian. The vertebral column retained the primitive condition of intercentra between the neighboring pleurocentra. The ribs possessed 2 heads, there were 2 sacral ribs, the ilium was not expanded, the skull was low, and snout was long and narrow. Eothyris had enlarged canines. Ophiacodon could reach over 4 meters in length. Because wrist and foot bones of Ophiacodon don’t ossify well, it might have been aquatic (Kemp, 1982; Carroll, 1988). Ianthasaurus was a small, primitive pelycosaur which developed a sail, measured only 60 cm, and probably fed on insects (Czerkas, 1990). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2)
Edaphosauria |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Edaphosaurs were a group of herbivorous pelycosaurs.
They had a small facial region, a smaller skull, and the lower jaw
was shortened. The members of this group may not be closely
related to each other. Cotylorhynchus was the largest pelycosaur
at 4 meters long and 600 kg (Kemp, 1982; Carroll, 1988). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3) Sphenacodontia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The sphenacodonts were the advanced pelycosaurs
from which the therapsids evolved. There
were a number of modifications in sphenacodonts that would be important
for later therapsids and mammals. Their
skull was deeper, their canines were enlarged, and there was increase
in jaw musculature. The angular
bone of lower jaw was modified, the
occipital region solidified and could receive stresses from jaw musculature,
the intercentra of vertebrae were reduced, the limbs were elongated, the
ilium was expanded, the supratemporal bone of the skull was reduced, and
the frontal bone of the skull forms part of orbit (eye socket). All sphenacodonts had tall neural spines on their vertebrae and this reached extreme lengths in species such as Dimetrodon. The sail made of these neural spines may have functioned in both thermoregulation and display. Sphenacodonts still retained the pineal opening of the skull and the ribs still had 2 heads. Haptodus of early Permian still retains most of ophiacondont characteristics (Kemp, 1982; Carroll, 1988). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||